A Different Classroom Experience

I’m trying a new pedagogical approach to the sophomore-level undergraduate course that I’m teaching this fall.  The course is called “Systems Thinking”.  I’m trying to avoid creating a boring, lecture-driven class for one of the undergraduate required core in ASU’s School of Sustainability.  Inspired by some of the recent work in Problem- and Project-based Learning (PPBL), I’ve come up with the following alternative.  Because this is a lower-level undergrad course with a number of topics that I want to make sure we cover, I didn’t think that we (I?) could handle a class that had a very strong outward, societally-driven, real-world project at its core.  Instead, I’m trying to build a forum for discussing ideas.  I’ve implemented parts of this in class before.  Just never to this extent.

The typical class session is structured like this:

Announcements, Framing the class session – 5 minutes

Discussion Leads – 10 minutes

Think-Pair-Share – 15 minutes (2 minutes thinking independently, 5 minutes with partners, 7 minutes with a few of the groups sharing with the entire class)

Lecture – 10 minutes

Rapporteurs – 5 minutes

Concluding comments – 5 minutes


Let me expand on the discussion lead role and that of the rapporteur.

Discussion Leads

Most classes will have 2 discussion leaders.  Discussion leads will have three roles or tasks.

The first task will be to meet with me in the days before your class session, typically at least 2 days beforehand. These meetings will be short, but they will help organize thoughts on the readings.

The second part will require carefully reviewing the readings for the class session.  Leads will then write a 1-page memo on the readings, guided by our meeting and the key questions that I have identified for the class period.  The memo should accomplish several things.  First, it should provide initial answers to the questions.  Second, it should raise any questions or areas that were unclear.  Third, it should provide “access” points for a facilitated discussion in class.  Feel free to discuss any differences or disagreements that you have with the author, weak arguments, etc.  The memos will be due the day before the class that they discuss.

The third part will take place in class.  The Discussion Leads for a given class will lead the class discussion.  This should introduce the topic, provide initial answers to the key questions that I raised for the day’s readings, and bring forward any other issues.  This will cover roughly 10 minutes. This will lead directly into the “think-pair-share” period.

The Rapporteur

Rapporteurs’ tasks are to take notes at meetings of importance, such as this class.  In parallel to the Discussion Leads, the Rapporteurs will keep track of discussion in class.  In particular, they will note areas of confusion, questions that need further exploration, and important points that were raised.  After the lecture, the rapporteurs will provide a synopsis or wrap-up of the class.

Beyond the class structure, I plan to have guest speakers for a few classes to bring in real-world examples.  I also have a field trip to ASU’s Decision Theater planned (http://dt.asu.edu/).

If anyone has thoughts, comments, or suggestions, please feel free to share them.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: