Posts Tagged ‘science’

SocSES Webinar with Denise Simmons on Innovation and Resilient Agriculture.

Here is a recording of our latest webinar for the SocSES webinar series.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Title

Reimagining Science-based and institutional-led innovation for a (Climate) Resilient Agricultural System in Guyana

Abstract:

This research analyzes how Guyana’s agricultural institutions are innovating to keep the climate-vulnerable rice sector resilient. Using the hypothesis of induced innovation, document analysis, and focus groups, it shows how science-based advances and polycentric collaboration—spanning new rice varieties, agronomy, ICT tools, and water management—co-produce adaptation. The work clarifies how institutional arrangements shape the generation, coordination, and scaling of climate-resilient innovation.

Bio: 

Denise Simmons is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Environmental Studies of the Faculty of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Guyana where she teaches courses in Environmental Chemistry, Aquatic Sciences and Environmental Impact Assessment. Her research interests and scholarly work are primarily in environmental pollution, environmental impact assessment, education for sustainable development, and more recently at the intersection of institutions, innovation and climate adaptation. She holds a BSc in Chemistry/Physics and a MSc in Environmental Science. She defended her dissertation in 2026 and graduated with a PhD in Innovation in Global Development from the Rob Walton College of Global Futures, Arizona State University.

__________________________________________________________________________________

This is the latest in a series of webinars. Past recordings can be found here.

SocSES Webinar with Amanda Jiménez Aceituno on Transformative Pathways towards Sustainable and Just Futures

Here is a recording of our latest webinar for the SocSES webinar series.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Title

Transformative pathways towards sustainable and just futures: Insights from the Seeds of Good Anthropocene and the 3 Horizons Approach

Abstract:

Contemporary ecological, social, and economic crises highlight how deeply global societies remain locked into unsustainable pathways. Shifting these pathways requires fundamental transformative changes, guided by new ways of relating to nature and addressing inequalities based on compelling and actionable visions of just and sustainable futures. Sustainability scholars have emphasized the need to identify opportunities for transformative change and to understand the agency of different actors and their collaborations in pursuing such transformations. In this seminar, I approach transformation theory from a social-innovation lens, drawing on insights from the Seeds of Good Anthropocenes project to explore how alternative, non-mainstream initiatives can build (or erode) resilience and open space for systemic change. I illustrate these dynamics with examples from the Resilience Must-Knows report, showing how coping, adaptation, and transformation unfold in practice. I then share findings from a case study in southeast Spain, where the Three Horizons methodology was used as a participatory scenario-building process to create desirable future visions, identify current system traps, and develop actionable strategies for regional change. Finally, I discuss emerging research on the role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities-led initiatives as catalysts for social-ecological transformations. Together, these insights show how local “seeds” and participatory foresight can help guide pathways toward more sustainable and just futures. 

Bio: 

Amanda Jiménez Aceituno is a sustainability researcher and theme leader at the Stockholm Resilience Centre with a background in Environmental Sciences and a PhD in Environmental Education. Jiménez´s work focuses on sustainability transformations, contributing to its conceptual and methodological development, such as the use of the values-rules-knowledge framework or the leverage points approach to reveal the transformative potential of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC)- led initiatives (e.g., Jiménez-Aceituno et al. 2025). The Seeds of the Good Anthropocenes approach has been a key platform in her study of transformations. Jiménez also works on developing and implementing transdisciplinary research methods that can enhance our understanding of collective processes and foster sustainability in social-ecological systems.

__________________________________________________________________________________

This is the latest in a series of webinars. Past recordings can be found here.

SocSES Webinar with Tara Grillos on Collective Decision Making and Experimental Evidence from Kenya

Here is a recording of our latest webinar for the PECS webinar series.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Title

Collective Decision Making & Local Public Goods – Experimental Evidence from Kenyas

Abstract:

One of Elinor Ostrom’s design principles for effective commons governance emphasizes the role of direct participation in decision making. Inclusion in collective decisions has been linked experimentally to greater self-stated willingness to invest in local public goods, increased public good contributions, and greater feelings of ownership over development projects, as compared with exclusion from or delegation of decisions. Yet there are a wide variety of methods that can be used to engage individuals directly in group decision making, and there is limited guidance on the design of collective choice institutions for achieving more socially optimal long-run outcomes. In this presentation, I will discuss evidence from two closely related experiments, one in the lab and one in the field (with co-author Michael Touchton), in which we randomly vary different participatory decision processes, ranging from purely aggregative to more deliberative approaches to group decision making. Both take place in the context of local public good provision in Kenya, where the constitution requires some form of citizen participation in government spending decisions and where the creation of local public goods is still quite salient due to a lack of basic infrastructure such as potable water systems. I will present data on the achievement of more socially optimal outcomes from the laboratory setting and on behavioral measures of long-run collective action from the field setting. We find that more deliberative procedures may lead to better decisions, but that these benefits do not necessarily translate into higher satisfaction among participants nor into greater long-run collective action. Our findings highlight tradeoffs in institutional design and suggest that practitioners and policy-makers should employ more demanding procedures only when they stand to be particularly impactful.  

Bio: 

Tara Grillos is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at Purdue University and co-director of the JMK Experimental Social Science Research Lab. She received her PhD in Public Policy from Harvard University and was a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Colorado’s Institute of Behavioral Science. Grillos teaches courses on environmental policy, causal inference, and experimental methods. Her research focuses on the human dimensions of sustainable development policy. She is interested in questions of participation, deliberation, collective action, and public goods provision, particularly with respect to natural resource dilemmas in developing countries. 

__________________________________________________________________________________

This is the latest in a series of webinars. Past recordings can be found here.

SocSES Webinar with Adriana Molina Garzón on Collaboration and Conflict

Here is a recording of our latest webinar for the PECS webinar series.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Title

Can interventions reduce extreme poverty in rural areas while conserving the environment? Evidence from RCTs

Abstract:

Balancing extreme poverty reduction with environmental conservation in rural LMICs requires credible causal evidence about which program designs deliver joint gains and when trade-offs arise. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in rural, forested contexts, adopting a multi-outcome approach that includes poverty (income, assets, consumption, living conditions, labor, agricultural production) and conservation (forest cover/land-use change; biodiversity when available). Our search across multiple sources resulted in 112 RCT studies, with only 5 measuring both poverty and conservation results. Preliminary synthesis indicates: (i) on poverty, main gains concentrate in assets and income and were most common under monetary and mixed designs; non-monetary programs showed fewer short-run welfare effects. (ii) On conservation, significant positive effects were more frequently reported by non-monetary designs, especially training/extension and monitoring, primarily on forest presence; monetary and mixed designs yielded few significant conservation effects. (iii) Among the five dual-outcome RCTs, avoided-deforestation PES consistently delivered environmental wins with neutral short-run poverty effects; auction-based targeting improved environmental performance; intensive technical assistance paired with training achieved joint gains; unconditional liquidity raised deforestation risk; and production re-specialization (e.g., eco-tourism) showed localized environmental benefits with slower income responses. Cross-cutting design features such as conditionality, monitoring, targeting, and implementation intensity (e.g., ongoing TA), appeared to mediate impacts, and short evaluation horizons often limited detection of slower-moving welfare effects. This review develops a typology of intervention modalities and a preliminary mapping from design features to likely outcome patterns, while highlighting critical evidence gaps: few RCTs measuring both domains, limited biodiversity outcomes, and heterogeneous, context-dependent effects.   

Bio: 

Adriana Molina-Garzón is an Assistant Professor at the Paul H. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs in Indianapolis. Her primary research focuses on the factors that hinder or promote sustainable development in rural areas, with particular attention to governance arrangements that enable such development. She is especially interested in community-based approaches, the role of NGOs, and collaborations among these actors.  

__________________________________________________________________________________

This is the latest in a series of webinars. Past recordings can be found here.